Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Neurology Perspectives ; 1(2):124-130, 2021.
Article in English, Spanish | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2254109

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed medical practice and severely disrupted the training of medical residents worldwide. The Spanish Society of Neurology conducted a study to assess its impact on the training of neurology residents in Spain. Method(s): We performed a descriptive, cross-sectional study through a survey distributed by e-mail to all neurology residents belonging to the Society. The survey included questions on demographic variables, care activity, and personal and educational impact of the pandemic, as well as respondents' expectations for the future of their work in the post-pandemic era. Result(s): Of 422 surveys sent, we received a total of 152 responses (36%);79 respondents (52%) were women and 73 (48%) were men. By year of residency, 51 respondents (33.6%) were in the fourth year, 45 (29.6%) in the third year, 28 (18.4%) in the second year, and 28 (18.4%) in the first year. A total of 139 respondents (90.8%) reported changes in hospital activity, and 126 (82.8%) considered the situation to have had a negative impact on their training, with 99 (64.7%) having lost non-recoverable rotations. Sixty-six percent of respondents (n=101) expressed a desire to extend their residency period. Conclusion(s): The pandemic has had an extremely severe impact on all areas of the health system, with trainee physicians being one of the most affected groups. Among neurology residents, the crisis has caused significant shortcomings in their training and clinical activities, through the suspension of specific rotations. A high percentage of respondents wished to extend the residency period.Copyright © 2021 Sociedad Espanola de Neurologia

2.
Neurologia (Barcelona, Spain) ; 36(7):531-536, 2021.
Article in Spanish | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1864136

ABSTRACT

Introducción La pandemia por COVID-19 ha tenido un impacto en el manejo del ictus isquémico;se ha descrito una disminución de los ingresos hospitalarios e incluso una interrupción en la cadena de atención y un aumento de la mortalidad intrahospitalaria. Sin embargo, falta evidencia sobre su impacto en el pronóstico funcional. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar el efecto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en el pronóstico funcional a 3 meses de los pacientes con ictus isquémico agudo hospitalizados en Aragón. Material y métodos Revisamos los datos de todos los pacientes ingresados por ictus isquémico en todos los hospitales de nuestro sistema sanitario entre el 30 de diciembre del 2019 y el 3 de mayo del 2020. Comparamos su mRS y la mortalidad a 3 meses de los hospitalizados antes y después de haberse establecido el estado de emergencia secundario a la pandemia por COVID-19. Resultados En total, 318 pacientes con ictus isquémico agudo cumplieron nuestros criterios de inclusión. No hubo diferencias en las características globales y específicas de cada periodo, excepto por una mayor proporción de pacientes mayores de 80 años de edad durante el periodo pre-CoV (42,2% vs. 29,0%, p = 0,028). En el análisis comparativo, no encontramos una diferencia significativa en la mortalidad (12,3 vs. 7,9, p = 0,465) o la proporción de pacientes con mRS ≤ 2 (57,7% vs. 57,1%, p = 0,425) a los 3 meses. Conclusión Hasta donde sabemos, este es el primer estudio que analiza el impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en el pronóstico funcional a 3 meses de pacientes con ictus isquémico. En nuestra comunidad autónoma, no ha habido un incremento en la mortalidad o discapacidad a 3 meses de pacientes hospitalizados por ictus isquémico durante el periodo de COVID-19.

3.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 36(7): 531-536, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1253425

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on ischaemic stroke management, with a reported decrease in hospital admissions, and even disruptions in healthcare and increased in-hospital mortality. However, there is a lack of evidence on the impact of the pandemic on functional prognosis. The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients hospitalised due to acute ischaemic stroke in Aragon (Spain). METHODS: We reviewed the data of all patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke to any hospital in our regional healthcare system between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020. We compared modified Rankin Scale scores and mortality at 3 months in patients hospitalised before and after the declaration of a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: In total, 318 patients with acute ischaemic stroke met our inclusion criteria. No differences were observed between periods in global or specific characteristics, with the exception of a higher proportion of patients older than 80 years during the first period (42.2% vs 29.0%, P = .028). In the comparative analysis, we found no significant differences in mortality (12.3 vs 7.9, P = .465) or in the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale scores ≤ 2 (57.7% vs 57.1%, P = .425) at 3 months. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyse the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the 3-month functional outcomes of patients with ischaemic stroke. In our region, there has been no increase in rates of mortality or disability at 3 months in patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , COVID-19 , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Stroke/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Eur J Neurol ; 27(12): 2491-2498, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-748698

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spain has been one of the countries more heavily stricken by SARS-CoV-2, which has had huge implications for stroke care. The aim was to analyse the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak on reperfusion therapies for acute ischaemic stroke in the northwest of Spain. METHODS: This was a Spanish multicentre retrospective observational study based on data from tertiary hospitals of the NORDICTUS network. All patients receiving reperfusion therapy for ischaemic stroke between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020 were recorded, and their baseline, clinical and radiological characteristics, extra- and intra-hospital times of action, Code Stroke activation pathway, COVID-19 status, reperfusion rate, and short-term outcome before and after the setting of the emergency state were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 796 patients received reperfusion therapies for ischaemic stroke. There was a decrease in the number of patients treated per week (46.5 patients per week vs. 39.0 patients per week, P = 0.043) and a delay in out-of-hospital (95.0 vs. 110.0 min, P = 0.001) and door-to-needle times (51.0 vs. 55.0, P = 0.038). Patients receiving endovascular therapy obtained less successful reperfusion rates (92.9% vs. 86.6%, P = 0.016). COVID-19 patients had more in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: A decrease in the number of patients benefiting from reperfusion therapies was found, with a delay in out-of-hospital and door-to-needle times and worse reperfusion rates in northwest Spain. COVID-19 patients had more in-hospital mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ischemic Stroke/therapy , Pandemics , Reperfusion , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Endovascular Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Ischemic Stroke/epidemiology , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Thrombolytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL